The mahā-vibhāṣā arguments for sarvāstivāda

Philosophy East and West 44 (3):489-499 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics Gets in the Way: A Reply to David Bastow.Chris Gudmunsen - 1972 - Religious Studies 8 (4):311 - 318.
Reply to David Nivison.James Behuniak - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (1):116-118.
David Ross Komito.Karen Lang - 1990 - Philosophy East and West 40 (2):256-258.
Remembering David hall: David L. hall (1937-2001).Roger T. Ames - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):277-280.
Reply to David Wong.Joel J. Kupperman - 1986 - Philosophy East and West 36 (3):283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#460,112)

6 months
2 (#1,373,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mind in Indian Buddhist Philosophy.Christian Coseru - 2012 - In Ed Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The first argument for sarv Stiv da.David Bastow - 1995 - Asian Philosophy 5 (2):109 – 125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references