Vagueness and arbitrariness: Merricks on composition

Mind 116 (461):105-113 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I respond to Trenton Merricks's (2005) paper ‘Composition and Vagueness’. I argue that Merricks's paper faces the following difficulty: he claims to provide independent motivation for denying one of the premisses of the Lewis-Sider vagueness argument for unrestricted composition, but the alleged motivation he provides begs the question.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
199 (#123,831)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Barnes
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Ordinary objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Argument from Vagueness.Daniel Z. Korman - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):891-901.
Sorites On What Matters.Theron Pummer - 2022 - In Jeff McMahan, Timothy Campbell, Ketan Ramakrishnan & Jimmy Goodrich (eds.), Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 498–523.
Composition.Daniel Z. Korman & Chad Carmichael - 2016 - Oxford Handbooks Online.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness, multiplicity and parts.Daniel Nolan - 2006 - Noûs 40 (4):716–737.

Add more references