The Sublime Stupidity of Alfred Hitchcock

International Journal of Žižek Studies 6 (3) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores the prolific filmography of Alfred Hitchcock in an attempt to untangle the Lacanian thread that has been traced through it by Slavoj Žižek, while also giving considerable focus to the Hegelianism underlying Hitchcock's dialectical engagement with Lacan's thesis "there is no such thing as a sexual relationship." Charting through particularly salient films in the Hitchcock labyrinth, including Notorious , Vertigo , and Marnie , this essay offers commentary on the presence throughout Hitchcock's work of such Lacanian concepts as desire, lack, the phallus, and the formulae of sexuation, while also elucidating the unmistakable and fundamental presence of the Hegelian dialectical shift that Žižek has spent so much of his career elaborating and which represents the highest point of Hitchcock's cinematic artistry, the point at which he reaches a level of sublimity that firmly situates him on the same philosophical plane as Hegel and Lacan

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,090

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Future of Art Criticism: Objectivism Goes to the Movies.Kyle Barrowman - 2018 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 18 (2):165-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references