The regulation of harm in international trade: a critique of James's Collective Due Care principle

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):255-263 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his important recent book, Aaron James has defended a principle ? Collective Due Care ? for determining when a form of economic integration is morally objectionable because it causes unjustified harm (including unemployment, wage suppression and diminished working conditions). This essay argues that Collective Due Care would yield implausible judgements about trade practices and would be too indeterminate to play the practical role for which it is intended

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autarky as a moral baseline.Kristi A. Olson - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):264-285.
Freedom and Justice in Trade Governance.Sarah C. Goff - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 34 (3):401-412.
Egalitarian Trade Justice.James Christensen - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 10 (1):119-138.
Inclusive Trade: Justice, Innovation, or More of the Same?Patricia Goff - 2021 - Ethics and International Affairs 35 (2):273-301.
Property Rights and the Resource Curse: A Reply to Wenar.Scott Wisor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:185-204.
Are trade subsidies and tariffs killing the global poor?Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland - 2012 - Social Research: An International Quarterly (4):865-896.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-26

Downloads
128 (#171,317)

6 months
16 (#189,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Barry
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references