The Kevorkian Challenge

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (3):17-22 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of self-determination in the dying process confronts a dilemma regarding clients’ desire to know and not to know. Ambivalence and guilt make “free choice” problematic in choosing the way to die. Telling dying clients the “whole truth” about their condition is an art or skill. The question of a meaningful death raises questions that philosophical analysis can help clarify.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,626

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Physician Non-disclosure & Paternalism In Terminal Care: Ethical Issues For Japanese Nurses.Emiko Konishi & Anne Davis - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (6):213-215.
Human Rights: An Appeal to Philosophers.Felix S. Cohen - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):617 - 622.
Confronting Death & Dying with An Aging Parent.Jing Jei You - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 3 (2):16-18.
Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.Stephen Hartley Daniel (ed.) - 2007 - University of Toronto Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
30 (#833,515)

6 months
1 (#1,601,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references