Tolerance and the distributed sorites

Synthese 196 (3):1071-1077 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On some accounts of vagueness, predicates like “is a heap” are tolerant. That is, their correct application tolerates sufficiently small changes in the objects to which they are applied. Of course, such views face the sorites paradox, and various solutions have been proposed. One proposed solution involves banning repeated appeals to tolerance, while affirming tolerance in any individual case. In effect, this solution rejects the reasoning of the sorites argument. This paper discusses a thorny problem afflicting this approach to vagueness. In particular, it is shown that, on the foregoing view, whether an object is a heap will sometimes depend on factors extrinsic to that object, such as whether its components came from other heaps. More generally, the paper raises the issue of how to count heaps in a tolerance-friendly framework.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Defeasible Tolerance and the Sorites.Ivan Hu - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy 117 (4):181-218.
Contextualism and the Principle of Tolerance.Paula Sweeney - 2014 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 90 (1):289-306.
Verities, the sorites, and Theseus’ ship.Igor Douven - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):3867-3878.
Recent Work on Vagueness.M. Eklund - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):352-363.
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-09

Downloads
1,462 (#10,855)

6 months
139 (#32,357)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zach Barnett
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.
Vagueness and contradiction.Roy A. Sorensen - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references