Numerical cognition needs more and better distinctions, not fewer

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We agree that the approximate number system truly represents number. We endorse the authors' conclusions on the arguments from confounds, congruency, and imprecision, although we disagree with many claims along the way. Here, we discuss some complications with the meanings that undergird theories in numerical cognition, and with the language we use to communicate those theories.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Weighted numbers.Mila Marinova, Marta Fedele & Bert Reynvoet - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.
Does the number sense represent number?Sam Clarke & Jacob Beck - 2020 - In Blair Armstrong, Stephanie Denison, Michael Mack & Yang Xu (eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
The number sense represents (rational) numbers.Sam Clarke & Jacob Beck - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44:1-57.
Numbers, numerosities, and new directions.Jacob Beck & Sam Clarke - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44:1-20.
A multilevel approach to modeling human cognition.Hongbin Wang, Todd R. Johnson & Jiajie Zhang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):626-627.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-16

Downloads
13 (#1,329,838)

6 months
7 (#730,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?