Agency Is Ecological: Comparative Religious Ethics and the Greening of Moral Theory

Journal of Religious Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Developments along various epistemic fronts have been gradually modifying our ethical conception of what constitutes agency. For several reasons, we should acknowledge in particular that there is an irremediably ecological character to moral action, in a number of respects. After providing a broad analysis of the ecological turn in moral theory, I reflect on some of its implications for our understanding of the historicity of morals. I then comment on ways in which the field of comparative religious ethics can enrich this emergent account of ecological agency, and vice versa.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anthropocene in Context: A Response to Rasmussen.Laura M. Hartman - 2023 - Journal of Religious Ethics 51 (1):186-201.
The Source of Responsibility.Randolph Clarke - 2023 - Ethics 133 (2):163–188.
Subjectivity and Human Agency.Theodora Bryan - 1995 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Everyday Morality.Nancy Eberhardt - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):393-414.
Buddhist ethics: A review essay. [REVIEW]Maria Heim - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):571-584.
Moral Progress and Human Agency.Michele M. Moody-Adams - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1):153-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-05

Downloads
3 (#1,850,836)

6 months
3 (#1,470,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?