Atheism and darwinism

In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 414 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although evolution by natural selection does not necessarily disprove the existence of God, it negates two of the more potent pro-religion arguments, here dubbed the ‘Argument from Complexity’ and the ‘Reassurance of Specialness’. In addition, it provides support for one of the strongest challenges to traditional religious belief, by contributing to the ‘Reiteration of Theodicy’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Does Fodor’s “Anti-Darwinism” Mean to Natural Theology?X. U. Yingjin - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):465-479.
The Problem of Evil.Michael L. Peterson - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK.
Naturalistic Theism.Teed Rockwell - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 25 (2):209-220.
Hume’s Natural History of Religion.Keith E. Yandell - 2016 - In Paul Russell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Theodicy.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2000 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview.
Normative Objections to Atheism.C. Stephen Evans - 2019 - In Graham Oppy (ed.), A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 491–505.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
36 (#624,854)

6 months
12 (#289,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references