Pain, Pleasure, and Unpleasure

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):1-14 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Compare your pain when immersing your hand in freezing water and your pleasure when you taste your favourite wine. The relationship seems obvious. Your pain experience is unpleasant, aversive, negative, and bad. Your experience of the wine is pleasant, attractive, positive, and good. Pain and pleasure are straightforwardly opposites. Or that, at any rate, can seem beyond doubt, and to leave little more to be said. But, in fact, it is not beyond doubt. And, true or false, it leaves a good deal more to be said: about the nature of sensory affect; its relations to perception, motivation, and rationality; its value; and the mechanisms underlying it. Much is said about these matters in the contributions that follow. Here, in this introductory essay, we map the dialectical landscape and locate our contributors’ papers within it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Evaluativist Accounts of Pain's Unpleasantness.David Bain - 2017 - In Jennifer Corns (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. New York: Routledge. pp. 40-50.
Pleasure, Pain, and Pluralism about Well-Being.Eden Lin - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.
The Benefits of Pain.Siri Leknes & Brock Bastian - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):57-70.
When Pain Isn't Painful.David Bain - 2015 - The Philosophers' Magazine 3.
Locke and Mind-Body Dualism.Douglas Odegard - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):87 - 105.
Pain and Evil.John Kemp - 1954 - Philosophy 29 (108):13 - 26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
901 (#24,779)

6 months
156 (#26,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Bain
Glasgow University
Michael S. Brady
University of Glasgow

References found in this work

A Materialist Theory of the Mind.D. M. Armstrong - 1968 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Ted Honderich.
The methods of ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1884 - Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
A Materialist Theory of the Mind.D. Armstrong - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (74):73-79.
Intentionalism defended.Alex Byrne - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):199-240.

View all 28 references / Add more references