John Earman and John D. Norton, eds., The Cosmos of Science. Essays of Exploration Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 18 (6):413-415 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bailer-Jones, Daniela M. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009, 248 pp. Blackell, Mark, John Duncan, and Simon Kow, eds. Rousseau and Desire, University of Toronto Press, 2009, 206 pp. Blackford, Russell, and Udo Schuklenk. 50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We. [REVIEW]Are Atheists - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (3):0026-1068.
Reply to Daniela Bailer-Jones.Nancy Cartwright - 2008 - In Stephan Hartmann, Luc Bovens & Carl Hoefer (eds.), Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 38--40.
John Earman, Allen I. Janis, Gerald J. Massey, and Nicholas Rescher, eds., Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grunbaum Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Chris Daly - 1995 - Philosophy in Review 15 (3):167-171.
Daniela Bailer‐Jones, 1969–2006.Peter Machamer - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):211 – 212.
Modeling prototypes: Daniela M. Bailer-Jones, Scientific models in philosophy of science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009, x+ 235 pp. US $45 ΗΒ.Demetris P. Portides - 2010 - Metascience 19 (2):281-284.
Daniela Bailer-Jones. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009. Pp. 248. $45.95. [REVIEW]S. G. Sterrett - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2):334-337.
Synopsis of the Robert and Sarah Boote conference in reductionism and anti-reductionism in physics.Nicholaos Jones & Kevin Coffey - unknown
Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, and Christine M. Korsgaard, eds., Reclaiming the History of Ethics. Essays for John Rawls Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Susan Dwyer - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18 (4):294-297.
John Earman, Bayes or Bust? Reviewed by.Patrick Maher - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (4):151-153.
Thomas L. Lennon, John M. Nicholas and John W. Davis, eds., Problems of Cartesianism Reviewed by.Desmond M. Clarke - 1984 - Philosophy in Review 4 (5):201-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-15

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references