Overcoming the Big Divide? The IJPS and the Analytic Continental Schism

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 32 (1):16-29 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophy in the 20th century witnessed a schism between so called ‘analytic’ and ‘continental’ schools of philosophy. One of the aims of the IJPS from its inception was to provide a space for articles attempting to overcome, or at least foreshorten, that divide. This paper critically examines the various understandings of the divide and takes a quick glance at some of the attempts to bridge it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatism and the History of the Analytic-Continental Divide. [REVIEW]Andreas Vrahimis - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies (4):541-554.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):1-2.
From a continental point of view: The role of logic in the analytic-continental divide.Franca D'Agostini - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
What is continental philosophy?Simon Critchley - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-01

Downloads
44 (#498,365)

6 months
14 (#215,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maria Baghramian
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Origins of analytical philosophy.Michael Dummett - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1980 - Critica 12 (34):125-133.
Pragmatism.W. James & F. C. S. Schiller - 1907 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 15 (5):19-19.

View all 30 references / Add more references