Why we should keep quiet at the zoo

Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 24:77-88 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Zoos are typically public attractions that do not explicitly, or through a more implicit culture, expect quietness from their guests. This paper will explore whether quietness is something we should aim for when we are visiting zoos. Primarily through analogy with other public spaces which share some of the key characteristics of zoos (libraries and schools, cinemas, theatres and galleries, war memorials, and hospitals and gardens), we suggest that quiet is indeed appropriate in zoos (more appropriate than being noisy). A major component of this argument will be the exploration of what is meant by quiet (and noise), and outlining a concept of quietness based on an idea of attention. The central premise here, drawing upon theories of attention and love, is that noise involves a certain kind of outward expression, which leaves less room for the appreciation of, and attention to, the animals and information that the zoo provides. The article will reflect on how a call for quiet may create scope for enhancing the educational possibilities of zoos, and how zoos might profit by taking the acoustic dimension of visitor behaviour into account when considering their values.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Opportunities and Challenges in Applying the 3Rs to Zoos and Aquariums.Sabrina Brando & Mickey Gjerris - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (4):1-16.
Material Animals.Cornelius Holtorf - 2013 - In Paul Graves-Brown, Rodney Harrison & Angela Piccini, The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press.
Covid-19 and the future of zoos.Angie Pepper & Kristin Voigt - 2021 - Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 16 (1):68-87.
Zoo animal welfare.Dita Wickins-Dražilová - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):27-36.
Captivity for Conservation? Zoos at a Crossroads.Jozef Keulartz - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):335-351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-25

Downloads
8 (#1,622,734)

6 months
8 (#432,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Badman-King
University of Exeter

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Sovereignty of Good.Iris Murdoch - 1971 - Religious Studies 8 (2):180-181.
No One Errs Willingly: The Meaning of Socratic Intellectualism.Heda Segvic - 2000 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19:1-45.
Captivity for Conservation? Zoos at a Crossroads.Jozef Keulartz - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):335-351.

Add more references