The Market for Feminist Epistemology

The Monist 77 (4):403-423 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At first blush, the notion a “feminist epistemology” appears, at best, peculiar—not, as Sandra Harding suggests, because “‘woman the knower’ appears to be a contradiction in terms” but because it is hard to see how an epistemology, a philosophical theory of knowledge, can be either feminist or anti-feminist since it is not clear how such a theory might benefit or harm women.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Could A Feminist Science Be?Barry R. Gross - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):434-444.
Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: an introduction.Sharon L. Crasnow & Kristen Intemann - 2024 - New York,: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Kristen Intemann.
Toward a Feminist Epistemology.Jane Duran - 1991 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Epistemology.Lorraine Code - 1998 - In Alison M. Jaggar & Iris Marion Young (eds.), A companion to feminist philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 173–184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
182 (#132,930)

6 months
22 (#137,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

H. E. Baber
University of San Diego

Citations of this work

Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.Elizabeth Anderson - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Feminine Firm.John Dobson - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):227-232.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references