"Good" worms and human rights

Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 38 (1):28-39 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The extent of Internet censorship in countries like China is regularly tested, but the testing methods used from within a censored country can entail risk for humans. A benevolent worm can be used for testing instead: the worm's self-replication, long the bane of suggested benevolent viruses and worms, is shown to be essential here. We describe the design of this benevolent worm, along with some other related applications for it. A technical, ethical, and legal analysis is provided.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Rights Without Political Participation?Walter J. Riker - 2014 - Human Rights Review 15 (4):369-390.
Benevolent absolutisms, incentives and Rawls’ The Law of Peoples.Pietro Maffettone - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (4):379-404.
The Social Impact of Computers.Richard S. Rosenberg - 1997 - Elsevier Academic Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?