Thinking of conceptual reviews and systematic reviews

Nursing Inquiry 25 (4):e12264 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/nin.12264

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On empty, redundant or pointless systematic reviews.Sally Thorne - forthcoming - Nursing Inquiry:e12634.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Moya Conrick - 1998 - Nursing Inquiry 5 (2):121-122.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Pamela J. Wood - 2004 - Nursing Inquiry 11 (3):203-204.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Jocelyn Keith - 2004 - Nursing Inquiry 11 (3):206-207.
Conference reviews.Akram Omeri - 1997 - Nursing Inquiry 4 (4):277-279.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Carol Windsor - 1998 - Nursing Inquiry 5 (2):120-121.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Jane Salvage - 2004 - Nursing Inquiry 11 (3):202-203.
Conference Reviews.Sharon Lewis & Jenny Browne - 1998 - Nursing Inquiry 5 (2):119-119.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Helen Keleher - 2004 - Nursing Inquiry 11 (3):207-208.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Elizabeth J. C. Scott - 2004 - Nursing Inquiry 11 (3):204-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-17

Downloads
20 (#1,043,550)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rediscovering the “Narrative” review.Sally Thorne - 2018 - Nursing Inquiry 25 (3):e12257.
Evidence-based policy.Eileen Munro - 2014 - In Nancy Cartwright & Eleonora Montuschi (eds.), Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Add more references