In Defense of Secular Belief

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 4 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 4.Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
There is No Free-Will Defense.James P. Sterba - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8:294-312.
Replies to Commentators.Annalisa Coliva - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (4):281-295.
The Rational/Non-Rational Distinction in Plato's Republic.Todd Ganson - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36:179-197.
A common defense of theistic belief: Some critical considerations. [REVIEW]M. Jamie Ferreira - 1983 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):129 - 141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-18

Downloads
133 (#166,624)

6 months
133 (#37,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yuval Avnur
Claremont College

Citations of this work

The Epistemology of Religion.Martin Smith - 2014 - Analysis 74 (1):135-147.
What Is Wrong With Agnostic Belief?Yuval Avnur - 2020 - In Francis Fallon & Gavin Hyman (eds.), Agnosticism: Explorations in Philosophy and Religious Thought. Oxford University Press USA. pp. Ch 2.
Excuses for Hume's Skepticism.Yuval Avnur - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):264-306.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references