Using Morally Controversial Human Cell Lines after Dignitas personae

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):265-272 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human cell lines are well-characterized laboratory cultures of human cells derived from a single source. In recent years, much moral controversy has surrounded human cell lines and biological materials obtained from aborted fetuses and destructive human embryo research. Dignitas personae instructs scientists of good conscience to avoid using biological materials of illicit origin, to distance themselves from evil, and to avoid scandal. The author suggests that the Instruction allows a scientist to delay discontinuing the use of a morally controversial cell line for a reasonable amount of time and allows a citizen of conscience to financially support—in a limited and restricted manner governed by prudence—philanthropic organizations that fund controversial biomedical research programs. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10.2 : 265–272.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,894

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dignitas personae and Cell Line Independence.Alvin Wong - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):273-280.
Dignitas personae, HEK 293, and the COVID Vaccines.Melissa Moschella - 2021 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 21 (1):107-121.
Morally Illicit Cells in Medical Research.Alan B. Moy - 2019 - Ethics and Medics 44 (6):3-4.
The Dignity of the Person.Mark S. Latkovic - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):283-305.
Dignitas personae and the Adoption of Frozen Embryos.John S. Grabowski & Christopher Gross - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):307-328.
Parthenotes, iPS Cells, and the Product of ANT-OAR.E. Christian Brugger - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (1):123-142.
Catholic Hospitals, Institutional Review Boards and Cooperation.Stephen Napier - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (2):257-266.
Is Embryo Adoption a Form of Surrogacy?Ryan C. Mayer - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (2):249-266.
The Moral Case for ANT-Derived Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (3):517-537.
The Moral Case for ANT-Derived Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines.Rev Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (3):517-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
42 (#600,591)

6 months
3 (#1,188,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references