Three Ways of Spilling Ink1

, &
In John Langshaw Austin (ed.), Philosophical Papers. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Picks up on a previous discussion of responsibility, freedom, and excuses, in which Austin argues that, in order to discover whether someone acted freely, we must discover whether certain excuses relevant to the situation at hand are acceptable. The notion of freedom, according to this view, is intractably linked to the notion of responsibility. Chapter 12 refines the previous discussion, by illuminating the differences between the notions of purpose, intention, and deliberation in a variety of speech acts.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/019283021x.003.0012

Other Versions

edition Austin, J. L. (1966) "Three ways of spilling ink". Philosophical Review 75(4):427-440

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reviews. J. L. Austin. The meaning of a word. Philosophical papers by J. L. Austin, edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961, pp. 23–43. Reprinted in Philosophy and ordinary language, edited by Charles E. Caton, University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1963, pp. 1–21. J. L. Ausnn. Truth. A reprint of XXIV 191. Philosophical papers by J. L. Austin, edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961, pp. 85–101. J. L. Austin. Unfair to facts. Philosophical papers by J. L. Austin, edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961, pp. 102–122. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):569-571.
Philosophical Papers. By J. L. Austin. Edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Oxford University Press, 1961, pp. 242.$ 5.25. [REVIEW]Norman J. P. Brown - 1962 - Dialogue 1 (2):205-207.
The vulnerability of reality: Austin, normativity, and excuses.Sandra Laugier - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Philosophical Papers.J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (eds.) - 1961 - Clarendon Press.
J. L. Austin and the Law: Exculpation and the Explication of Responsibility.Daniel Yeager - 2005 - Bucknell University Press.
Austin on Actions and Speech Actions.Joe Friggieri - 1987
Towards a Theory of Moral Responsibility.Randall Rex Curren - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Shooting a Donkey: Accidents and Mistakes in Austin and McEwan.David Rudrum - 2013 - Philosophy and Literature 37 (2):421-434.
Symposium on J. L. Austin. [REVIEW]J. B. R. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (4):756-756.
The Literary Speech Act: Don Juan with J.L. Austin, Or Seduction in Two Languages.Shoshana Felman - 1983

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
10 (#1,469,896)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Action, control and sensations of acting.Benjamin Mossel - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 124 (2):129-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references