- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
World Map of Scientific Misconduct
Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1653-1656 (2018)
Abstract
A comparative world map of scientific misconduct reveals that countries with the most rapid growth in scientific publications also have the highest retraction rate. To avoid polluting the scientific record further, these nations must urgently commit to enforcing research integrity among their academic communities.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Erratum to: World Map of Scientific Misconduct.Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1657-1657.
Characteristics of Global Retracted Publications in Engineering Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis.Shahnaz Khademizadeh, Sara Dakhesh & Brady Lund - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-16.
Status of retraction notices for biomedical publications associated with research misconduct.Daniel Drimer-Batca, Jonathan M. Iaccarino & Alan Fine - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (2):1-5.
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct: Commentary on ‘challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity’.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (b. mishkin).Debra M. Parrish - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):299-301.
The american experience: Lessons learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy.Alex Mabou Tagne, Niccolò Cassina, Alessia Furgiuele, Elisa Storelli, Marco Cosentino & Franca Marino - 2020 - Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (2):193-205.
The Swedish Research Council’s Definition of ‘Scientific Misconduct’: A Critique.Håkan Salwén - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):115-126.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-06-27
Downloads
33 (#719,344)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
2017-06-27
Downloads
33 (#719,344)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain.Ramón A. Feenstra, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar & Daniel Pallarés-Domínguez - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21.
Research Ethics: Researchers Consider How Best to Prevent Misconduct in Research in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions Through Ethics Education.Angelina Patrick Olesen, Latifah Amin & Zurina Mahadi - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1111-1124.
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.Bita Mesgarpour, Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki, Payam Kabiri, Leila Janani, Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Zahra Torkashvand-Khah & Erfan Shamsoddin - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-8.
Characteristics of Global Retracted Publications in Engineering Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis.Shahnaz Khademizadeh, Sara Dakhesh & Brady Lund - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-16.
References found in this work
Chinese and Iranian Scientific Publications: Fast Growth and Poor Ethics.Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):317-319.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo