Hegel's View of the Rights and Limits of Formal Thinking

Russian Studies in Philosophy 9 (4):336-353 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. The characterization of Hegel's teaching as dialectical is usually associated with a critique of the logic that preceded his and that was dominant in his time: that of the Wolffians and, in particular, of Kant and the Kantians. All in all, to characterize Hegel's teaching in this way is entirely in accord with the facts. However, when stated in so general a form, it leaves much unclarified and undoubtedly demands further concreteness. The article we offer here for the reader's consideration is an attempt at a concretization of this order. Central to this matter is the question of formal thinking: did Hegel accept the rights of formal thinking, and, if so, to what degree?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hegel's critique of Kant.Aaron James Wendland & Rafael Winkler - 2015 - South African Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):129-142.
Hegel and formal idealism.Manish Oza - 2022 - Hegel Bulletin:1-25.
Conceiving.John W. Burbidge - 2011 - In Stephen Houlgate & Michael Baur (eds.), A Companion to Hegel. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 159–174.
Hegel’s Reasoning.C. W. Webb - 1978 - Idealistic Studies 8 (3):206-219.
The Role of Logic "Commonly So Called" in Hegel's Science of Logic.Paul Redding - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):281-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
22 (#964,163)

6 months
6 (#838,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references