- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Probing Pre- and In-service Physics Teachers’ Knowledge Using the Double-Slit Thought Experiment
Science & Education 23 (9):1811-1833 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Consolidating Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge Using Didactical Reconstructions.T. Mäntylä & M. Nousiainen - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (8):1583-1604.
Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of History of Mathematics and Their Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Using History of Mathematics in Mathematics Education.Mustafa Alpaslan, Mine Işıksal & Çiğdem Haser - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (1):159-183.
Coherence of Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Views of the Relatedness of Physics Concepts.Maija Nousiainen - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (3):505-525.
Whatever happened to STS? Pre-service physics teachers and the history of quantum mechanics.Samson Nashon, Wendy Nielsen & Stephen Petrina - 2008 - Science & Education 17 (4):387-401.
Analysis of double-slit interference experiment at the atomic level.Jonathan F. Schonfeld - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67:20-25.
Obtaining Laws Through Quantifying Experiments: Justifications of Pre-service Physics Teachers in the Case of Electric Current, Voltage and Resistance.Terhi Mäntylä & Ari Hämäläinen - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (5-6):699-723.
Retrocausation acting in the single-electron double-slit interference experiment.Noboru Hokkyo - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (4):762-766.
A Double‐Slit Experiment for Non‐Classical Interference Effects in Decision Making.Pierfrancesco La Mura - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):58-62.
Throw Them All in One Pot? Differences in Stereotypes About Subgroups of Pre-Service Teachers.Martin Otto Stuckert, Toni Ihme, Anna Südkamp & Jens Möller - 2021 - Frontiers in Education 6.
No Paradox in Wave–Particle Duality.Andrew Knight - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1723-1727.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-02-15
Downloads
23 (#946,185)
6 months
11 (#356,365)
2018-02-15
Downloads
23 (#946,185)
6 months
11 (#356,365)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
How do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science.Nancy Nersessian - 1992 - In R. Giere & H. Feigl (eds.), Cognitive Models of Science. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 3--45.
History, philosophy, and science teaching: The present rapprochement.Michael R. Matthews - 1992 - Science & Education 1 (1):11-47.
Conceptual change in science and in science education.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1989 - Synthese 80 (1):163 - 183.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-mnmvz uwo