Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):480-482 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although informed consent models for prescribing hormone replacement therapy are becoming increasingly prevalent, many physicians continue to require an assessment and referral letter from a mental health professional prior to prescription. Drawing on personal and communal experience, the author argues that assessment and referral requirements are dehumanising and unethical, foregrounding the ways in which these requirements evidence a mistrust of trans people, suppress the diversity of their experiences and sustain an unjustified double standard in contrast to other forms of clinical care. Physicians should abandon this unethical requirement in favour of an informed consent approach to transgender care.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Models of Informed Consent.Lynn A. Jansen - 2021 - Social Philosophy and Policy 38 (2):50-71.
Conscience, Disobedience, and Standard of Care.Stephen R. Latham - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (4):10-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-18

Downloads
109 (#196,145)

6 months
17 (#176,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?