Unifying the Categorical Imperative

Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper demonstrates something that Kant notoriously claimed to be possible, but which Kant scholars today widely believe to be impossible: unification of all three formulations of the Categorical Imperative. Part 1 of this paper tells a broad-brush story of how I understand Kant’s theory of practical reason and morality, showing how the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative appear to be unified. Part 2 then provides clear textual support for each premise in the argument for my interpretation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On the Singularity of the Categorical Imperative.Guus Duindam - 2023 - Southwest Philosophy Review 39 (1):165-173.
Understanding Kant's Ethics.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the categorical imperative.Anders Bordum - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):851-874.
Categorical Imperative as the Source for Morality.Joyce Lazier - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 217–220.
Can Positive Duties be Derived from Kant’s Categorical Imperative?Michael Yudanin - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):595-614.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-28

Downloads
2,311 (#5,121)

6 months
179 (#20,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa

References found in this work

The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.
The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.Michael Stocker - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.

Add more references