Making living versus nonliving distinctions: Lessons from infants

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):477-478 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Developmental research on infants' categorization of living and nonliving objects finds that very young children are equally skilled in grouping such objects. The lack of a specialization for one type of object over another may be due to knowledge of function and the time frame for acquiring such knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ambiguous figures: Living versus nonliving objects.Ilse M. Verstijnen & Johan Wagemans - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview Pub. Co. pp. 33--5.
Living and Nonliving Occasionalism.Simon Weir - 2020 - Open Philosophy 3 (1):147-160.
Category specificity in mind and brain?Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):497-504.
Young infants' expectations about self-propelled objects.Renée Baillargeon, Di Wu, Sylvia Yuan, Jie Li & Luo & Yuyan - 2009 - In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie R. Santos (eds.), The origins of object knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young infants' expectations about self-propelled objects.Renée Baillargeon, Sylvia di WuYuan, Jie Li & Yuyan Luo - 2009 - In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie R. Santos (eds.), The origins of object knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#692,402)

6 months
9 (#509,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references