Positive Egalitarianism Reconsidered

Utilitas 34 (1):19-38 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According topositive egalitarianism, not only do relations of inequality have negative value, as negative egalitarians claim, but relations of equality also have positive value. The egalitarian value of a population is a function of both pairwise relations of inequality (negative) and pairwise relations of equality (positive). Positive andnegative egalitarianismdiverge, especially in different-number cases. Hence, an investigation of positive egalitarianism might shed new light on the vexed topic of population ethics and our duties to future generations. We shall here, in light of some recent criticism, further develop the idea of giving positive value to equal relations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equality and Priority.Dennis Mckerlie - 1994 - Utilitas 6 (1):25.
An Egalitarian Argument against Reducing Deprivation.Julia Mosquera - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):957-968.
Relational egalitarianism.Rekha Nath - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (7):1-12.
Relational egalitarianism, future generations, and arguments from overlap.Tim Meijers & Dick Timmer - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Taking equality seriously.Eva Maria Parisi - 2020 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Parfit's Leveling down Argument against Egalitarianism.Ben Saunders - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 251–253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-10

Downloads
34 (#714,571)

6 months
10 (#326,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gustaf Arrhenius
Stockholm University
Julia Mosquera
Institute for Future Studies, Stockholm

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):283 - 345.

View all 36 references / Add more references