- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Methods in bioethics: the way we reason now
New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress & Matthew Adams (2017)
Abstract
Principlism : the Borg of bioethics -- A common morality for hedgehogs : Bernard Gert -- Getting down to cases : the revival of casuistry in bioethics -- Nice story but so what : narrative and justification in ethics -- Dewey and Rorty's pragmatism and bioethics -- Freestanding pragmatism in bioethics and law -- A method in search of a purpose : the internal morality of medicine -- Method to rule them all? Reflective equilibrium in bioethics -- Concluding reflections : method in bioethics : the very idea.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
pt. I. Theoretical and methodological issues. Methods in bioethics / James Childress ; The way we reason now: reflective equilibrium in bioethics / John Arras ; Autonomy / Bruce Jennings ; Mental disorder, moral agency, and the self / Jeanette Kennett ; 'Reinventing' the rule of double effect. [REVIEW]Daniel Sulmasy - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pragmatism as a research program – a reply to Arras.Maartje Schermer & Jozef Keulartz - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (1):19-29.
The four-principle formulation of common morality is at the core of bioethics mediation method.Shahram Ahmadi Nasab Emran - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):371-377.
Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics.John D. Arras - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):69-85.
Commentary: A Consensus about “Consensus”?Mark P. Aulisio & Robert M. Arnold - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):328-331.
Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry.Ana Smith Iltis - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):271-284.
The hedgehog and the Borg: Common morality in bioethics.John D. Arras - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Common morality versus specified principlism: Reply to Richardson.Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver & K. Danner Clouser - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):308 – 322.
Casuistry and principlism: The convergence of method in biomedical ethics. [REVIEW]Mark Kuczewski - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):509-524.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-12-10
Downloads
37 (#607,164)
6 months
9 (#475,977)
2022-12-10
Downloads
37 (#607,164)
6 months
9 (#475,977)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content.Thomas H. Murray - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):13-15.
Relational Ethics for Public Health: Interpreting Solidarity and Care.Bruce Jennings - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 27 (1):4-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-ksrwm uwo