The behavioral sciences are historical sciences of emergent complexity

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):18-19 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Unlike physics and chemistry, the behavioral sciences are historical sciences that explain the fuzzy complexity of social life through historical narratives. Unifying the behavioral sciences through evolutionary game theory would require a nested hierarchy of three kinds of historical narratives: natural history, cultural history, and biographical history. (Published Online April 27 2007).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do the cognitive and behavioral sciences need each other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
More obstacles on the road to unification.Eric Alden Smith - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):41-41.
Against the unification of the behavioral sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Unifying the behavioral sciences II.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):45-53.
Evolutionary theory and the social sciences.Robert L. Burgess & Peter C. M. Molenaar - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):20-21.
Implications for law of a unified behavioral science.Owen D. Jones - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):30-31.
The limitations of unification.Arthur B. Markman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):33-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#232,662)

6 months
21 (#139,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Larry Arnhart
Northern Illinois University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references