Imagination as Groundless Ground

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):477-496 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay attempts to further the Heideggerian reading of the transcendental imagination in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, by substantiating Heidegger’s contested claims, that the imagination is identical to “original time,” the imagination generates secondary, successive time, and therefore categories of the understanding are formal abstractions from a more primordial temporal horizon. I argue that Heidegger’s reading of Kant remains completely tenable based on A 142-143, by first examining Heidegger's thesis, and then defending it by analyzing the above-mentioned section. Finally, I comment on the implications of the Heideggerian reading, in terms of both the role of the transcendental imagination in the Kantian system, as well as the implications of Heidegger’s overall deconstruction of reason itself.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Kant, Time and the 'Form' of Intentionality.Sacha Golob - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):345 - 367.
The Imagination in Kant and Fichte, and Some Reflections on Heidegger’s Interpretation.George J. Seidel - 2016 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 21 (2):213-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-07

Downloads
38 (#596,272)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Duane Armitage
University of Scranton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references