Introduction: Consequences in Medieval Logic

Vivarium 56 (3-4):201-221 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_ Source: _Volume 56, Issue 3-4, pp 201 - 221 This paper summarizes medieval definitions and divisions of consequences and explains the import of the medieval development of the theory of consequence for logic today. It then introduces the various contributions to this special issue of _Vivarium_ on consequences in medieval logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-27

Downloads
97 (#217,235)

6 months
21 (#140,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacob Archambault
Fordham University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Medieval theories of consequence.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:1-21.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tarski on truth and logical consequence.John Etchemendy - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):51-79.
On the idea of a general proof theory.Dag Prawitz - 1974 - Synthese 27 (1-2):63 - 77.
On the Concept of Following Logically.Alfred Tarski - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):155-196.
Comparing Substructural Theories of Truth.David Ripley - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
Logical consequence revisited.José M. Sagüillo - 1997 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):216-241.

View all 11 references / Add more references