- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective
MIT Press (1984)
Abstract
The explanation versus understanding debate was important to the philosophy of thesocial sciences from the time of Dilthey and Weber through the work of Popper and Hempel.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Understanding and Explanation. A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective.[author unknown] - 1988 - Studies in Soviet Thought 35 (1):57-61.
Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective.Georgia Warnke (ed.) - 1984 - MIT Press.
Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective.Steve Fuller - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):152-154.
Karl-Otto Apel, Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental Pragmatic Perspective Reviewed by.Patricia Hughes - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (9):413-415.
Die Erklären: Verstehen Kontroverse in Transzendental-Pragmatischer Sicht. [REVIEW]J. Bar - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):851-852.
Max Weber and Understanding Explanation.Wolf Feuerhahn - 2023 - In Nathalie Bulle & Francesco Di Iorio (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Methodological Individualism: Volume I. Springer Verlag. pp. 31-56.
Understanding and validity: from hermeneutic to pragmatic. A reading of Karl-Otto Apel.Nathalie Zaccai-Reyners - forthcoming - Theory and Society.
De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests.Jeroen Bouwel & Erik Weber - 2008 - Human Studies 31 (4):423-442.
De-ontologizing the debate on social explanations: A pragmatic approach based on epistemic interests.Van Bouwel Jeroen & Weber Erik - 2008 - Human Studies 31 (4):423-442.
Hempel on Scientific Understanding.Xingming Hu - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (8):164-171.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-06
Downloads
104 (#203,942)
6 months
9 (#485,111)
2014-02-06
Downloads
104 (#203,942)
6 months
9 (#485,111)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Habermas and Apel on communicative ethics: Their difference and the difference it makes.Franklin I. Gamwell - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (2):21-45.
The Complex 'I'. The Formation of Identity in Complex Systems.Paul Cilliers & Tanya De Villiers-Botha - 2010 - In F. P. Cilliers & R. Preiser (eds.), Complexity, Difference and Identity. Issues in Business Ethics. Springer. pp. 19–38.
From the Self to the Other and Back Again: Intersubjectivity as a Perpetual Motion Around the Self.Anna Michalska - 2020 - Gestalt Theory 42 (3):303-318.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-vpvvv uwo