Reply to Cooper

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):599-610 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘The matter will hinge on this point: what will be established is the ideal wise and virtuous person either of the Stoics or of the Old Academy [Platonists and Aristotelians]. You can’t have both; the dispute between them is not about boundaries but about complete ownership, since all rationale for living is involved in one’s definition of the final good, and dispute about that is dispute about all rationale for living. So it can’t be both, since they disagree so deeply; it must be one or the other.…I am dragged in different directions—at one time one view seems more convincing to me, at other times the other. Still, unless one or other of them is the case, I firmly believe that virtue is defeated. But—just on this issue they disagree.’

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Cooper.Review Author[S.]: Julia Annas - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):599-610.
On innateness: A reply to Cooper.Noam Chomsky & Jerrold Katz - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (January):70-87.
What Basis for Morality?Sissela Bok - 1993 - The Monist 76 (3):349-359.
Kant Versus Frege on Arithmetic.Nora Grigore - 2022 - Axiomathes 32 (2):263-281.
Reply to commentators. [REVIEW]Alvin I. Goldman - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):215–227.
Separate minds.Marcia Cavell - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (233):359 - 371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#467,452)

6 months
6 (#571,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Annas
University of Arizona

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references