The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood

Hastings Center Report 17 (5):31-40 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

New Jersey's Baby M case has thrust the issue of surrogate motherhood on state legislatures throughout the country. Like artificial insemination in the 1950s and 1960s, this new reproductive technology is evoking legislative responses ranging from horrified prohibition to cautious facilitation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
26 (#906,600)

6 months
4 (#909,732)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists.Lori B. Andrews - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):72-80.
Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis.Ruth Macklin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):57-64.
Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby‐selling?R. Jo Kornegay - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.
Legislative Approaches to Surrogate Motherhood.R. Alta Charo - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):96-112.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references