Nietzsche's Will To Power As A Doctrine Of The Unity Of Science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):729-750 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Anderson.Nancy Cartwright - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):495-497.
Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson.Stephen L. Adler - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):135-142.
How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?A. G. - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451.
Notes on the Contributors.[author unknown] - 2005 - Angelaki 10 (1):219-220.
How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?George A. Reisch - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
77 (#269,114)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The history of philosophy as philosophy.Gary Hatfield - 2005 - In Tom Sorell & Graham Alan John Rogers (eds.), Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 82-128.
Nietzsche contra Darwin.John Richardson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):537-575.
Nietzsche was no Darwinian.Patrick Forber - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):369–382.

Add more citations