How important is Kelley’s model of the attribution process when men and women discuss rape in conversation?

&
Semiotica 110 (1-2):1-22 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/semi.1996.110.1-2.1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Questioning attribution theory: Are Kelley’s dimensions spontaneously requested?Geoffrey Beattie & Irina Anderson - 1995 - Semiotica 103 (3-4):277-290.
Geoffrey W. Beattie.Judee K. Burgoon, Thomas Saine, Marianne La France & Clara Mayo - 1985 - Semiotica 57:375.
Perceived ethicality of guided imagery in rape research.Jamess H. Korn, Timothy J. Huelsman, Cynthia K. Shinabarger Reed & Michelle Aiello - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (1):1-14.
Rape Myths, Catastrophe, and Credibility.Emily C. R. Tilton - 2022 - Episteme:1-17.
Against Our Will. Men, Women and Rape.J. B. Elshtain - 1976 - Télos 1976 (30):237-242.
Loose Women, Lecherous Men. [REVIEW]Alan Soble - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (4):411-416.
Attributions as behavior explanations: Toward a new theory.Bertram Malle - 2003
Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape.Larry May & Robert Strikwerda - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
Susan Brownmiller, "Against Our Will. Men, Women and Rape".Jean Bethke Elshtain - 1976 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 30:237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
11 (#1,422,077)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references