Focussing and proof construction

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 107 (1-3):131-163 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper proposes a synthetic presentation of the proof construction paradigm, which underlies most of the research and development in the so-called “logic programming” area. Two essential aspects of this paradigm are discussed here: true non-determinism and partial information. A new formulation of Focussing, the basic property used to deal with non-determinism in proof construction, is presented. This formulation is then used to introduce a general constraint-based technique capable of dealing with partial information in proof construction. One of the baselines of the paper is to avoid to rely on syntax to describe the key mechanisms of the paradigm. In fact, the bipolar decomposition of formulas captures their main structure, which can then be directly mapped into a sequent system that uses only atoms. This system thus completely “dissolves” the syntax of the formulas and retains only their behavioural content as far as proof construction is concerned. One step further is taken with the so-called “abstract” proofs, which dissolves in a similar way the specific tree-like syntax of the proofs themselves and retains only what is relevant to proof construction

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Focussing and proof construction.Jean-Marc Jean-Marc - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 107 (1-3):131-163.
Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
On transformations of constant depth propositional proofs.Arnold Beckmann & Sam Buss - 2019 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 170 (10):1176-1187.
Sequent reconstruction in LLM—A sweepline proof.R. Banach - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 73 (3):277-295.
Linear logic with fixed resources.Dmitry A. Archangelsky & Mikhail A. Taitslin - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 67 (1-3):3-28.
Programs for Structured Proofs.Lee Harrison Blaine - 1980 - Dissertation, Stanford University

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
52 (#465,629)

6 months
6 (#730,479)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Context Update for Lambdas and Vectors.Reinhard Muskens & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh - 2016 - In Maxime Amblard, Philippe de Groote, Sylvain Pogodalla & Christian Rétoré, Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996–2016). Berlin, Germany: Springer. pp. 247--254.
Imperative programs as proofs via game semantics.Martin Churchill, Jim Laird & Guy McCusker - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (11):1038-1078.
On the unity of duality.Noam Zeilberger - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 153 (1-3):66-96.
A categorical semantics for polarized MALL.Masahiro Hamano & Philip Scott - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145 (3):276-313.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references