- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The ontological argument revisited
Philosophical Review 69 (4):452-474 (1960)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Ontological Argument Revisited.Sushanta Sen - 1983 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 10 (2):219-242.
The Ontological Argument Revisited: A Reply to Rowe.Eric Wilson - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):37 - 44.
The Reliability of Sense Perception by William P. Alston. [REVIEW]Richard Foley - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):133.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
192 (#127,759)
6 months
21 (#139,579)
2009-01-28
Downloads
192 (#127,759)
6 months
21 (#139,579)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the logic of the ontological argument.Paul E. Oppenheimer & Edward N. Zalta - 1991 - Philosophical Perspectives 5:509-529.
Counterfactuals and Scientific Realism.Michael J. Shaffer - 2012 - London and Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo