Why art is never representation - even when it represents

Abstract

The question of whether or not art is essentially a representation of reality has long been a bone of contention among philosophers of art – especially in the major branch of that discipline called the analytic philosophy of art, or analytic aesthetics. This paper argues that art - visual art, literature or music - is never essentially representation. The argument is based on the thinking of André Malraux in "The Voices of Silence".

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-08

Downloads
946 (#22,876)

6 months
113 (#51,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek Allan
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references