The Role of Formal Logic in Hamilton's Argument for the Philosophy of the Conditioned

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (2):197-211 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reconstructs Sir William Hamilton's argument for thinking that the unconditioned is not an object of thought, a conclusion he abbreviates with the slogan ‘to think is to condition’. The paper describes Hamilton's conception of formal logic as the study of the laws of thought and claims that this conception allows these laws, particularly those of non-contradiction and excluded middle, to play a substantive role in Hamilton's argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberalism and the Polygamy Question.Jon Mahoney - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:161-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-05

Downloads
31 (#725,454)

6 months
7 (#699,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.Wolfgang Schwarz - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.

Add more references