Carnap's contexts : Comte, Heidegger, Nietzsche

In C. G. Prado, A house divided: comparing analytic and continental philosophy. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carnap apparently never mentions August Comte’s name in his writings. Not that that is unusual. He seldom discusses individuals, or historical references of any sort. But you cannot evade context, and nothing comes from nothing. Merely allowing the name of “logical positivist” makes Comte a context for Carnap, which is hardly inappropriate, since Comte practically invented the idea of a “philosophy of science.” We can learn about the positivist mentality (for instance, how it is still with us) by searching out the commonalities of positivism from Comte to Carnap. Nietzsche and Heidegger are more explicit contexts for Carnap, as he refers to them and passes judgment on their work, especially in his 1931 paper, “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache.” Appearing in the logical-positivist organ Erkenntnis, it announces the “elimination” or “overcoming” of metaphysics by logical analysis, and became a foundational metaphilosophical text for what has come to be called “analytic” philosophy. By setting Carnap in these three contexts—his positivism, his polemic with Heidegger, his reading of Nietzsche—I shall expose the presuppositions and intellectual limitations of Carnap’s approach to philosophy. Misreadings abound whenever he mentions Nietzsche or Heidegger, misreadings used to support the metaphilosophical myth of a woolly “continental” tradition in philosophy, distinct from the austere precision of “analysis.” The latter (the ur-form of “analytic” philosophy) is not just different from the “continental” metaphysics Carnap excoriates. It is better, more serious, intellectually clearer and cleaner.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the Nothing Noth?Michael Inwood - 1999 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 44:271-290.
A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (review).Wybo Houkes - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (4):554-555.
Carnap, Kuhn, and revisionism: On the publication of structure in encyclopedia. [REVIEW]J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):147-157.
Carnap, Kuhn, and revisionism: on the publication of Structure in Encyclopedia.J. C. P. Oliveira - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):147-157.
Carnap on Logic and Experience.Wybo Houkes - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:287-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,954,454)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry Allen
McMaster University

Citations of this work

Continental Philosophy of Science.Babette Babich - 2007 - In Constantin V. Boundas, The Edinburgh Companion to the Twentieth Century Philosophies. Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh Press. pp. 545--558.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references