Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation

Informal Logic 18 (2) (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I criticize a case made by George Bowles for a certain theory pertaining to the evaluation of arguments on which the (degree of) attributed favourable relevance of an argument's premises to its conclusion is relevant to its evaluation, but nevertheless argue that such favourable relevance is indeed relevant to an argument's evaluation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Deductive/Inductive Distinction.George Bowles - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3):159-184.
Affirming the consequent.George Bowles - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):429-444.
Premissary relevance.J. Anthony Blair - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):203-217.
The Paradoxical Associated Conditional of Enthymemes.Gilbert Plumer - 2000 - In Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen & Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
Carroll’s Regress Times Three.Gilbert Plumer - 2023 - Acta Analytica 38 (4):551-571.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
70 (#301,725)

6 months
23 (#133,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek Allen
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Propositional Relevance.George Bowles - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (2).
Favorable Relevance and Arguments.George Bowles - 1989 - Informal Logic 11 (1).
Inferential Soundness.Derek Allen - 1988 - Informal Logic 10 (2).

Add more references