Rhetoric is not Important Enough for Economists to Bother About

Economics and Philosophy 4 (1):173 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0266267100000419

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What economics is not: An economist's response to Rosenberg.Douglas W. Hands - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
Intentionality and Economics.Allin Cottrell - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):159-176.
Is Economics Empirical Knowledge?Steven Rappaport - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):137-158.
Economics - Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Rosenberg Alexander. University of Chicago Press, 1992, xvii + 266 pages. [REVIEW]A. W. Coats - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):386.
Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? by Alexander Rosenberg. [REVIEW]Donald Mccloskey - 1993 - Isis 84:838-839.
No Title available: Reviews.Gordon Winston - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (2):315-322.
Rosenberg's “Lakatosian Consolations for Economists”: Comment.E. Roy Weintraub - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (1):139-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
25 (#879,283)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Rosenberg
Duke University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references