Democratising Measurement: or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-23 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thick concepts, namely those concepts that describe and evaluate simultaneously, present a challenge to science. Since science does not have a monopoly on value judgments, what is responsible research involving such concepts? Using measurement of wellbeing as an example, we first present the options open to researchers wishing to study phenomena denoted by such concepts. We argue that while it is possible to treat these concepts as technical terms, or to make the relevant value judgment in-house, the responsible thing to do, especially in the context of public policy, is to make this value judgment through a legitimate political process that includes all the stakeholders of this research. We then develop a participatory model of measurement based on the ideal of co-production. To show that this model is feasible and realistic, we illustrate it with a case study of co-production of a concept of thriving conducted by the authors in collaboration with a UK anti-poverty charity Turn2us.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

"Just the Facts": Thick Concepts and Hermeneutical Misfit.Rowan Bell - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly (TBA).
Frames and concepts in the philosophy of science.Stephan Kornmesser - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):225-251.
Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research.Sophia Efstathiou - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:46-61.
Thick Concepts and Holism about Reasons.Andrew Sneddon - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):461-468.
Moral Responsibility for Concepts.Rachel Fredericks - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1381-1397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-08

Downloads
1,053 (#20,571)

6 months
211 (#15,441)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

The usefulness of well-being temporalism.Gil Hersch - 2022 - Journal of Economic Methodology 30 (4):322-336.
What should scientists do about (harmful) interactive effects?Caterina Marchionni & Marion Godman - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-16.
Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarks.Borhane Blili-Hamelin & Leif Hancox-Li - 2023 - Facct '23: Proceedings of the 2023 Acm Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 23:271 - 284.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (11):20-40.

View all 51 references / Add more references