A systematics for problems of action

Philosophy of Science 18 (1):16-25 (1951)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bertrand Russell, in one of his gentler jibes at the pragmatists, says that this school would obviously prefer Othello, the man of action to Hamlet, the man of thought. This figure is singularly inept since Hamlet brought about the death of six people through violent action. That more than equalled the score rolled up by the presumably more active Othello. What Hamlet lacked was not the power to act but an adequate theory of action. Having first attempted to avoid the issue presented by the murder of his father, he is swept up in a gale of violence because of that very attempt at avoidance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dionysus in the Mirror: Hamlet as Nietzsche's Dionysian Man.Pyles Timothy - 2017 - Philosophy and Literature 41 (1A):128-141.
Hamlet and the Time of Action.Henry Somers-Hall - 2015 - In Roman Altshuler & Michael J. Sigrist (eds.), Time and the Philosophy of Action. New York: Routledge. pp. 272-283.
Shakespearean Tragedy Revisited: Death in Othello and Hamlet.Lhoussain Simour, Moussa Yassafi & Adel Fartakh - 2014 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 1 (1).
Foreword to the German Edition of Lilian Winstanley's Hamlet and the Scottish Succession.Carl Schmitt - 2010 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2010 (153):164-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#318,374)

6 months
20 (#150,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?