Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley's Siris

History of European Ideas 37 (1):23-34 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Berkeley's Siris may be an unduly neglected treatise. Yet it reveals and confirms its author's philosophical ambitions and achievements. The greatest of them is his theory of causality. Berkeley tries to show that agents can influence the world by using ethereal corpuscles as their instruments. These particles are both material but also in some sense immaterial or occult because they both follow and do not follow the laws of nature. Siris is a rhetorical text which uses analogy, metaphor, paradox, and ambiguity to illuminate the reader. I argue that the universe in Siris is ambiguous with respect to its material and immaterial essence. The world is at the same time scientific and material and metaphysical and immaterial. Berkeley fights against scientific mechanistic materialism when he subordinates science to God's will. I try to clarify how ambiguity works for Berkeley the metaphysician in establishing the superiority of minds or agents over matter and mechamisms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
42 (#558,368)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Francis Bacon and Atomism: a Reappraisal.Silvia Manzo - 2001 - In William Newman, John Murdoch & Cristoph Lüthy, Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscularian Matter Theory. E.J. Brill. pp. 209-243.

Add more references