Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?

Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (7):394-399 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Decisions in healthcare are made against the background of cultural and philosophical definitions of disease, sickness and illness. These concepts or definitions affect both health policy and research , as well as individual encounters between patients and physicians . It is therefore necessary for evidence-based medicine to consider whether any of the definitions underlying research prior to the hierarchisation of knowledge are indeed compatible with its own epistemological principles

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Evidence-Based Medicine Implicitly Rely on Current Concepts of Disease or Does It Have to Develop Its Own Definition?Andreas Gerber - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics: The Journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics 33 (7):394-399.
On the triad disease, illness and sickness.Bjørn Hofmann - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):651 – 673.
The origins of medical evidence: Communication and experimentation.Joachim Widder - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):99-104.
Some thoughts on phenomenology and medicine.Miguel Kottow - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (3):405-412.
Evidence-based medicine and ethics: a practical approach.P. Vineis - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):126-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#834,437)

6 months
2 (#1,694,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references