Review: Duhem versus Galileo [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (31):237 - 248 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Agassi and Berkson.L. Pearce Williams - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):252.
Review: Philosophising about Galileo. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):255 - 264.
The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to dr Agassi.H. G. Alexander - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):229-234.
Essay Review: The Natural Philosophy of Galileo.A. Rupert Hall - 1972 - British Journal for the History of Science 6 (1):80-84.
Review. The cambridge companion to Galileo. P Machamer [ed].George Gale - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):539-543.
The Duhem thesis.Roger Ariew - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):313-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
124 (#176,534)

6 months
12 (#312,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Agassi
York University

Citations of this work

Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (2):67-85.
Between science and technology.Joseph Agassi - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references