On the Limits of Scientific Explanation: Hempel and Evans-Pritchard

Philosophical Forum 1 (2):171 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, Hempel has questioned the universal applicability of the deductive model of causal explanation, and suggested supplementing it with a probability model.' When we explain the fact that one child got the measles by the suggestion that he caught it from another child, we are not using the deductive model, he says, since catching measles is a matter of mere probability and not of strict causality: playing with an infected child is not a sufficient condition for infection.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deductivism Visited and Revisited.Wesley C. Salmon - 1997 - In Wesley C. Salmon, Causality and Explanation. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Explanation, Causation and Deduction.Fred Wilson - 1985 - Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Reidel.
Explanation.W. H. Newton-Smith - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith, A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 127–133.
Scientific explanation.James Woodward - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-67.
Tuomela on deductive explanation.Charles G. Morgan - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (4):511 - 525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
51 (#447,550)

6 months
51 (#101,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Agassi
York University

Citations of this work

Towards a theory of openness to criticism.Tom Settle, I. C. Jarvie & Joseph Agassi - 1974 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (1):83-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references