On the Strength of PFA in Conjunction with a Precipitous Ideal on ɷ1 and Namba-Like Forcings on Successors of Regular Cardinals [Book Review]

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 24 (4):456-457 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,711

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Combined Maximality Principles up to large cardinals.Gunter Fuchs - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):1015-1046.
Stationary reflection.Yair Hayut & Spencer Unger - 2020 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 85 (3):937-959.
A forcing axiom for a non-special Aronszajn tree.John Krueger - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (8):102820.
Souslin trees at successors of regular cardinals.Assaf Rinot - 2019 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 65 (2):200-204.
Kurepa trees and Namba forcing.Bernhard König & Yasuo Yoshinobu - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1281-1290.
An exposition of the compactness of.Enrique Casanovas & Martin Ziegler - 2020 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 26 (3-4):212-218.
On the strength of no normal precipitous filter.Moti Gitik & Liad Tal - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):223-243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-04

Downloads
28 (#886,150)

6 months
11 (#332,193)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references