The revisability paradox

Philosophical Forum 34 (3-4):383–390 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A new revisability paradox.Daniel Y. Elstein - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):308–318.
Katz’s revisability paradox dissolved.Allard Tamminga & Sander Verhaegh - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):771-784.
Naturalism and the paradox of revisability.Mark Colyvan - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):1–11.
Review of Jonathan Adler, Belief's Own Ethics[REVIEW]Earl Conee - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (10).
Jonathan E. Adler.Aims-Curricula Fallacy - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 27 (2):223.
List of Reviewers.[author unknown] - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (6):845-848.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#596,272)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University

Citations of this work

Naturalism and the paradox of revisability.Mark Colyvan - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):1–11.
Katz’s revisability paradox dissolved.Allard Tamminga & Sander Verhaegh - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):771-784.
Is Everything Revisable?Peter Baumann - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4:349-357.
A new revisability paradox.Daniel Y. Elstein - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):308–318.

Add more citations

References found in this work

IElliott Sober.Elliott Sober - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):237-280.

Add more references